Dermatological changes in pregnant women treated in public health units

Authors

  • Michelle Magalhães Postgraduation Program in Maternal and Child Health, Universidade Franciscana, Brazil
  • Antonio Bruno C. Ferreira Postgraduation in Applied Linguistics and Language Studies. Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, PUC/SP, Brazil
  • Claudia Zamberlan Postgraduation Program in Maternal and Child Health, Universidade Franciscana, Brazil
  • Leonardo O. F. Bianchini Postgraduation in Biomedical Gerontology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, PUCRS, Brazil
  • Kelvin Leandro M. Monçalves Postgraduation Program in Maternal and Child Health, Universidade Franciscana, Brazil
  • Luiz Fernando Rodrigues Júnior Postgraduation Program in Maternal and Child Health, Universidade Franciscana, Brazil
  • Franceliane Jobim Benedetti Postgraduation Program in Maternal and Child Health, Universidade Franciscana, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20252545

Keywords:

Maternal and child health, Dermatosis, Pregnant women, Public health

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy, particularly its second and third trimesters, causes intense physical, emotional, and psychological changes in women, including the skin, hair, and nails. Objectives were to describe the association between dermatological changes and sociodemographic conditions, anthropometric nutritional status, and previous and gestational diseases.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Brazilian public health units, including women in the third trimester of pregnancy with or without dermatological lesions. They answered a questionnaire with sociodemographic data, health history, and dermatological changes. The researchers photographed the lesions and recorded the dermatological and anthropometric assessment results on a form. They used statistical tests (e.g., ANOVA and chi-square) and Spearman's correlation, with a 5% significance level.

Results: The study analyzed 100 pregnant women with a mean age of 26.35±6.49 years and a mean income of 1.68±0.72 Brazilian minimum wages; 30 (30%) women had previous diseases, and 64 (64%) did not report obstetric history. Phototype II was the most common, in 41 (41%) women, and hyperchromia and stretch marks were the most frequent dermatoses. Pre-gestational BMI correlated significantly with the number of dermatological changes-which had a higher prevalence in obese pregnant women. Thin pregnant women had a mean of 2.75±0.95a dermatological changes; normal-weight women, 2.50±1.34ab; overweight, 3.16±1.34a; and obese, 3.55±1.21ac (p=0.014). Furthermore, 82.8% of patients with stretch marks had inadequate weight gain.

Conclusions: The study highlights the complexity of obstetric care in this population, requiring a multidisciplinary approach in prenatal care, focusing on managing metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities, weight control, and prevention of dermatological complications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gandolfi FR, Gomes MF, Reticena KDO, Santos MS, Damini NMACV. Changes in women’s life and body during pregnancy. Braz J Surg Clin Res. 2019;27(1):126-31.

Ferreira AA, Souza BG, Silva BF Mendonça, Rocha DB de S, Rocha MB, et al. Myths and truths about the physiological adaptations of the gestational period: a methodology for health professionals. Braz J Health Rev. 2020;3(5):1306413070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv3n5-136

Garcia AMA, Neto FSS, Vidal GP. Análise das principais alterações estéticas provenientes da gravidez: uma revisão integrativa. Res Society Development. 2020;9(9):e14996332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.6332

Alves TV, Bezerra MMM. Principais alterações fisiológicas e psicológicas durante o Período Gestacional. Rev Mult Psic. 2020;14(49):114-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/idonline.v14i49.2324

Abade LPF, Sampaio NCFM, Estella PC. Semiologia Dermatológica. Botucatu: FMBUNESP. 2023.

Pinheiro AC, Queirós C, Alvim AS. Manifestações Dermatológicas na Gravidez. Acta Med Port. 2022;35(5):376-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.13520

Snarskaya ES, Olisova OU, Makatsariya AD, Kochergin NG, Radetskaya L, Bitsadze V, et al. Skin pathologies in pregnancy. J Perinatal Med. 2019;47(4):371-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2018-0338

Ciechanowicz P, Sikora M, Taradaj K, Ruta A, Rakowska A, Kociszewska-Najman B, et al. Skin changes during pregnancy. Is that an important issue for pregnant women? Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(8):449-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0077

Dorileo ÉAG, Silva MP da, Costa TM da, Felipe JC, Roselino AMF. Especificidades da estruturação da evolução clínica para prontuário eletrônico em dermatologia. Anais. 2006

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Caderneta da Gestante. 8ª ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2023. Disponível em: caderneta_gestante_8ed.pdf. Available at: http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/ portaldab/publicacoes/caderneta_gestante_8ed.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2025.

Kac G, Carilho TRB, Rasmussen KM, Reichenheim ME, Farias DR, Hutcheon JA, Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium. Gestational weight gain charts: results from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(5):1351-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa402

Purim KS, Avelar MF de S. Photoprotection, melasma and quality of life in pregnant women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2012;34(5):228-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032012000500007

Carvalho JAM, Wong LRA. A window of opportunity: some demographic and socioeconomic implications of the rapid fertility decline in Brazil. Demogr Res. 1995;91.

Borges ALV, Santos OJ. Desigualdade no acesso aos métodos contraceptivos no Brasil. Rev Bras Estud Popul. 2016;33(2):421-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-30982016a0002

Berquó E, Cavenaghi S. Planejamento familiar, contracepção e desigualdades no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30(11):241-52.

James RE, Smith L, Williams J. Gestational diabetes and maternal obesity: risks and management strategies. Obstet Gynecol J. 2020;55(3):215-23.

Sibai BM, Williamson B, Martin JD. Cardiovascular conditions in pregnancy:

management and outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(7):721-30.

O'Hara MW, McCabe JE. Postpartum depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:379-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185612

Kourtis AP, Read JS, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy and infection. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(23):2211-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1213566

Lolis MS, Bowe WP, Shalita AR. Dermatologic conditions in pregnancy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2009;10(3):191-201.

Tunzi M, Gray GR. Common skin conditions during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(2):211-8.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-21

How to Cite

Magalhães, M., Ferreira, A. B. C., Zamberlan, C., Bianchini, L. O. F., Monçalves, K. L. M., Júnior, L. F. R., & Benedetti, F. J. (2025). Dermatological changes in pregnant women treated in public health units. International Journal of Research in Dermatology, 11(5), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20252545

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles