Clinico-histopathological study of tattoo reactions in tertiary care center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20220494Keywords:
Tattoo reactions, Granulomatous, Red inkAbstract
Background: Tattooing is nowadays very common practice especially among young people and we are witnessing a gradual increase of numerous potential reactions to tattoos. Purpose of this study was to identify the various tattoo reactions and to correlate it with histopathological examination and early interventions to decrease further morbidity.
Methods: From December 2017 to September 2019, patients reporting with reactions due to tattooing were included in the present study after obtaining informed consent. A detailed history regarding the onset, duration and colour used for tattooing were collected and noted. Cutaneous examination and biopsy were done in all cases to know the type of reaction.
Results: The analysis included 50 patients who had tattoo reactions. The most common age group affected was 16-30 years, with slight male predominance. Most of the cases (64%) with tattoo reaction presented to us within 1 to 4 months of disease presentation. Clinically, most cases had granulomatous reaction 23 (46%). On histopathology, granulomatous reaction was the most common type observed. Red colour dye was the most common colour associated with reaction seen. Clinico-histopathological correlation of various types of tattoo reaction revealed consistency with diagnosis in 17 (34%) patients, clinically as well as on histopathological examination.
Conclusions: Lack of strict regulations by government and increased fashion trends increase complications associated with tattoos. Red inks are the most frequently associated with tattoo reactions. Granulomatous type reactions are a frequently reported pattern of inflammation seen in tattoo.
Metrics
References
Pesapane F, Nazzaro G, Gianotti R, Coggi A. A short history of tattoo. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(2):145.
Khunger N, Molpariya A, Khunger A. Complications of tattoos and tattoo removal: Stop and think before you ink. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015;8(1):30-6.
Bäumler W. Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of tattoo colorants and ingredients in mouse and man: the known and the unknown. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;48:176-84.
Mataix J, Silvestre JF. Cutaneous adverse reactions to tattoos and piercings. Actas Dermo Sifiliogra´ficas Engl Ed. 2009;100(8):643-56.
Urdang M, Mallek JT, Mallon WK. Tattoos and piercings: A review for the emergency physician. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(4):393-8.
Kazandjieva J, Tsankov N. Tattoos: dermatological complications. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(4):375-82.
Klügl I, Hiller KA, Landthaler M, Bäumler W. Incidence of health problems associated with tattooed skin: a nation-wide survey in German-speaking countries. Dermatology. 2010;221(1):43-50.
Sanghavi SA, Dongre AM, Khopkar US. Adverse reactions to tattoos: a study from the hilly region in northern India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;4(7):2556-63.
Tang MM, Beltraminelli H, Perruchoud D, Pelivani N, Borradori L, Simon D. A tattoo complicated by allergic contact dermatitis and panniculitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(1):127-8.
Vilaplana J, Chimenos JM, Fernández AI, Pereira-Veiga N, Romaguera C. Problems in the diagnosis of contact dermatitis by tattooing. Exogenous Dermatol. 2002;1(6):307-12.
Kaatz M, Elsner P, Bauer A. Body-modifying concepts and dermatologic problems: Tattooing and piercing. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26(1):35-44.
Aberer W, Snauwaert JE, Render UM. Allergic reaction to pigments and metals. In: DeCuyper C, editor. Dermatologic complications with body art: tattoos, piercings and permanent makeup. 1st ed. Belgium: Springer link; 2010: 66-73.
Sowden JM, Byrne JP, Smith AG, Hiley C, Suarez V, Wagner B, et al. Red tattoo reactions: X-ray microanalysis and patch-test studies. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124(6):576-80.
Chave TA, Mortimer NJ, Johnston GA. Simultaneous pseudolymphomatous and lichenoid tattoo reactions triggered by re-tattooing. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2004;29(2):197-9.