Comparison of seminar and lecture as teaching method and student perception on the seminar and lecture in medical education


  • Chidambaram Dharmambal Department of Dermatology, Government Vellore Medical College, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Somasundaram Anavarathan Department of Public Health, Government of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, India



Seminar, Teaching methods, Lecture


Background: The current teaching methodology in medical education is mostly lecture. Many studies have mentioned that lectures alone are ineffective in bringing up student interaction and skills. Published literature reports that students are willing to accept innovative and interactive teaching methodologies. A study was conducted to compare the seminar vs. lectures in medical teaching and to describe perception of medical students about seminar and lecture.

Methods: For comparison between seminar and lecture 88 participants from third MBBS students were randomly assigned for the Seminar and lecture methods including cross over technique by splitting the topic of leprosy into two parts. We conducted pre and post-tests after each session for both groups with the same questionnaire with total score of 36 for 36 questions. For opinion study we used a simple closed ended questionnaire on perception of on the two teaching methods. Data was analysed using SPSS software for computation of mean differences in the score and chi square proportions appropriately.

Results: Least significant difference post hoc test indicates difference in the teaching methods. Mean score difference between pre and post-tests in both methods demonstrate that seminar is effective teaching method (p<0.05). Seminar evoked interest, provided more opportunities interact. In both methodologies schematic arrangement of the topic and improvement in communication skills was similar.

Conclusions: Seminar was effective than didactic lecture interest and active participation as well as improves the ability to understand. To impart effective learning a combination of different teaching methods have to be used.

Author Biographies

Chidambaram Dharmambal, Department of Dermatology, Government Vellore Medical College, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Dermatology

Associate Professor and Head of the Department

Somasundaram Anavarathan, Department of Public Health, Government of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, India

Additional Director, Public health, Government of TamilNadu


Misal DD, Maulingkar SV, D’Mello MA, Rataboli PV. Students’ opinions on the prevailing and innovative methods in medical education technology and changes recommended. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2016;5:121-5.

Palappallil DS, Sushama J, Ramnath SN. Effectiveness of modified seminars as a teaching-learning method in pharmacology. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016;6(3):195-200.

Chavda N, Yadav P, Chaudhari M, Kantharia ND. Second year students feedback on teaching methodology and evaluation methods in Pharmacology. Nat J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;1:23-31.

Huo LZ, Chen DX, Li Q, Wang XY. Effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Teach. 2020;42 (12):1343-9.

Purohit G, Harsod JM, Shah GV. An experimental study on evidence based education system: an innovative and advance teaching method. Int J Basic Appl Physiol. 2012;1(1):22-5.

Mahajan A, Kaushal K. Impact of innovative pedagogical teaching methods on students' academic performance. Niger J Clin Res. 2017;6:41-4.

Kotwal A. Innovations in teaching/learning methods for medical students: Research with mentoring. Indian J Public Health. 2013;57:144-6.

Kar SS, Premarajan KC, L S, Archana R, Iswarya S, A S. Student-centred learning in Community Medicine: An experience from Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry. Natl Med J India. 2014;27(5):272-6.

Parmar P, Rathod GB. Study of innovative teaching methods to enhance teaching and learning in Forensic medicine. IAIM. 2015;2(8):78-80.






Original Research Articles