DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20200471

Nerve conduction study: can it diagnose leprosy early?

Karthik Sunki, Bramhini B. Koneti, Navya Sreerangapuri, Yerrabelli Mounika, Padmaja Pinjala, J. V. D. S. Prasad

Abstract


Background: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease which predominantly involves skin and peripheral nerves. Most important consequences of leprosy are due to the involvement of peripheral nerves which leads to gross deformities and disabilities. Detection of preclinical nerve function impairment can help in the prevention of deformities and disabilities. The objective of the study was role of nerve conduction study (NCS) to detect nerve function impairment (NFI) in leprosy.

Methods: An electrophysiological study was conducted for 50 newly diagnosed cases of leprosy from December 2017 to July 2019 at Department of Dermatology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad. Nerve conduction velocities, amplitude, and latencies of ulnar, median, common peroneal, posterior tibial, sural nerves are measured.

Results: 10 nerves in each patient with a total of 500 nerves were studied by NCS. Only 8 (16%) cases had totally normal NCS. And rest 42 (84%) cases have abnormal NCS. Most common pattern observed is sensory motor axonal neuropathy. A total of 268 (53.6%) nerves were normal before starting multidrug therapy and 232 (46.4%) nerves have abnormal NCS. Among these nerves the involvement of Sensory nerves (49%) are more than motor nerves (42%).

Conclusions: NCS is a reliable and reproducible test to detect the early NFI. Though it cannot directly diagnose leprosy, it can be used in suspected cases, newly diagnosed cases, and household contacts to detect the NFI early and prevent the complications associated with it.

 


Keywords


Leprosy, Nerve conduction study, Detect nerve function impairment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nations SP. Katz JS, Lyde CB, Barohn RJ, Amersterdam, the Netherlands: Excerpta Medica. 1990: 273-82.

Scollard DM, Adams LB, Gillis TP, Krahenbuhl JL, Truman RW, Williams DL. The continuing challenges of leprosy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:338-81.

Lamanna C. The Nature of the Acid-fast Stain. J. Bacteriol. 1946;52(1):99-103.

Mahajan VK. Slit-skin smear in leprosy: lest we forget it! Indian J Lepr. 2013;85:177-83.

Vashisht D, Das AL, Joshi R. Nerve conduction studies in early tuberculoid leprosy: Indian Dermatol Online J. 2014;5(2):71-5.

Roy P, Dhar R, Patro P, Hoogar MB, Sahu S. Histopathological study of leprosy patients in a tertiary care hospital in Navi Mumbai. Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;9(2):6-12.

Kadam YR, AshtekarRS, Pawar VR, Pimpale AN. A study of leprosy patients attended tertiary care hospital. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3(12):3419-22.

Khamankar ST, Wagha S, Dawande P. Recent trend in leprosy: Histopathological study aspect in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Basic Applied Med Res. 2016;5(2):481-6.

Pokhrel K, Parajuli S, Shah M, Subedi S. Clinico-histopathological Correlation of Leprosy in Western Region of Nepal - A Pilot Study. Indian J Lepr. 2017;89:9-14.

Thapa DP, Jha AK. Clinico- histopathological Correlation in Leprosy: A Tertiary Care Hospital Based Study. Our Dermatol Online. 2013;4(3):294-296.

Ramadan W, Mourad B, Fadel W, Ghoraba E. Clinical, electrophysiological and immune-pathological study of peripheral nerves in Hansen’s disease. Lepr Rev. 2001;72:35-49.

Marahatta S, Bhattarai S, Paudel BH. Electrophysiological profiles of leprosy neuropathy. Lepr Rev. 2017;88:373-80.

Mshana RN, Humber DP, Harboe M, Belehu A. Demonstration of mycobacterial antigen in nerve biopsies from leprosy patients using peroxidase-antiperoxidase immunoenzyme technique. Clim Immunol Immunopathol. 1983;29:359-68.

Samant G, Shetty VP, Uplekar MW, Antia NH. Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of nerve function impairment following cessation of multidrug therapy in leprosy. Lepr Rev. 1999;70:10-20.

Mc Leod JG, Hargrave JC, Booth GC, Gye RS, Barron SA. Nerve conduction studies in leprosy. Int J Lepr. 1975;43:21-31.