Allergic phytodermatitis due to Toxicodendron succedaneum in sub Himalayan region of North India: a clinical study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20174168Keywords:
Phytodermatitis, Allergic contact dermatitis, Toxicodendron succedaneumAbstract
Background: Phytodermatitis refers to inflammation of the skin caused by a plant. The clinical patterns of dermatitis due to plants can present as allergic phytodermatitis, photophytodermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis or in the form of mechanical injury. The commonest plant causing allergic contact dermatitis in India is Parthenium hysterophorus, followed by other plants. Phytodermatitis due to Toxicodendron succedaneum is not uncommon in sub Himalayan range of North India and it has variable clinical presentation.The aim of the study was to study and evaluate the patients of allergic contact dermatitis due to T. succedaneum.
Methods: All patients having allergic contact dermatitis due to T. succedaneum from August 2015 to July 2016 were enrolled for the study.
Results: Our study included 13 (76.4%) males and 4 (23.5%) females with a mean age of 32 years. 76.4% patients developed lesions within 24-48 hours after contact with plant, 17.6% after 48 hours and 5.8% developed in less than 24 hours. Most of the (88.2%) patients presented with disseminated lesions and 11.7% had localised lesions involving only hands and forearms. Urticaria (41.1% ) was the commonest finding followed by papuloplaque lesions (in 29.4% patients), further followed by erythema multiforme like lesions (in 11.7% patients) and maculopapular, vesiculobullous lesions and angiodema (in 5.8% of each patients). Patch test was positive in 16 (94.1%) cases. Majority of patients required systemic steroids to settle the dermatitis.
Conclusions: Allergic contact dermatitis due to T. succedaneum is very common in this region. Although it presents with widespread clinical presentations but adequate literature was not found on this plant. This plant further requires more study to know the dermatitis caused by it.
Metrics
References
Mensing H, Kimmig W, Hausen BM. Airborne contact dermatitis. Hautarzt. 1985;36:398-402.
Menz J, Winkelmann RK. Sensitivity to wild vegetation. Contact Dermat. 1987;16:169-73.
Goon ATJ, Goh CL. Plant dermatitis: Asian Perspective. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56(6):707–10.
Fisher AA, Mitchell JC. Toxicodendron plants and spices. In: Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilins; 1995: 461-523.
Craig JC, Waller CW, Billets S, Elsohly MA. New GLC analysis of urushiol congeners in different plant parts of poison ivy, Toxicodendron radicans. J Pharm Sci. 1978;67:483-5.
Le Coz C, Ducombs G. Plants and plant products. In: Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP, editors. Contact dermatitis. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2006: 769.
Tanner TL. Rhus (Toxicodendron) dermatitis. Prim Care. 2000;27:493-502.
Gladman AC. Toxicodendron dermatitis: poison ivy, oak, and sumac. Wilderness Environ Med. 2006;17:120-8.
Werchniak AE, Schwarzenberger K. Poison ivy: an underreported cause of erythema multiforme. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51:159-60.
Rademaker M, Duffill MB. Allergic contact dermatitis to Toxicodendron succedaneum (rhus tree): an autumn epidemic. N Z Med J. 1995;108(997):121-3.
Pasricha JS, Singh SN. Evaluation of antigen impregnated discs for patch tests. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1982;48:327-9.
Nandakishore T, Pasricha JS. Pattern of cross-sensitivity between 4 Compositae plants, Parth-enium hysterophorus, Xanthium strumarium, Heli-anthus annuus and Chrysanthemum coronarium, in Indian patients. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;30:162-7.
