Comparative assessment of cutaneous delivery of clobetasol propionate from two topical cream formulations using an in vitro Franz diffusion model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20263735Keywords:
Clobetasol propionate, Franz diffusion cell, Skin permeation, Skin retention, Topical corticosteroidAbstract
Background: The therapeutic effectiveness of topical corticosteroids depends on their ability to achieve adequate skin retention while minimizing systemic absorption. This study compared the cutaneous delivery characteristics of two clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream formulations, clobetasol 0.05% cream and clobetasol 0.05% cream (innovator), using an in vitro Franz diffusion model.
Methods: Comparative skin permeation studies were conducted using excised swine skin mounted on Franz diffusion cells in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 428. A 100 mg dose of each formulation was applied to the skin surface and receptor fluid samples were collected over 12 hours. Clobetasol propionate concentrations were quantified using a validated HPLC method. Drug permeation, skin retention and surface residue were determined.
Results: Both formulations exhibited low transdermal permeation and substantial skin retention. At 12 hours, cumulative permeation was 2.52% for clobetasol 0.05% cream and 2.85% for clobetasol 0.05% cream (innovator). Skin retention was 59.25% and 52.67%, respectively, while the remaining drug was estimated as surface residue. Although minor differences in permeation kinetics were observed, the overall distribution profiles of clobetasol propionate were comparable between the two formulations.
Conclusions: Clobetasol 0.05% cream and clobetasol 0.05% cream (innovator) demonstrated comparable cutaneous delivery characteristics, with high skin retention and minimal transdermal permeation. The findings indicate that both formulations effectively localize clobetasol propionate within the skin, supporting their suitability for topical treatment of inflammatory dermatoses.
References
Benson HAE. Transdermal drug delivery: penetration enhancement techniques. Curr Drug Deliv. 2005; 2(1):23–33.
Hadgraft J. Skin, the final frontier. Int J Pharm. 2001; 224(1–2):1–18.
Wolverton SE. Comprehensive Dermatologic Drug Therapy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier. 2020.
Shah VP, Elkins JS, Williams RL. Evaluation of in vitro release test methods for topical drug products. Pharm Dev Technol. 1998; 3(3):299–306.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 428: Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method. Paris: OECD Publishing. 2004.
Franz TJ. The finite dose technique as a valid in vitro model for the study of percutaneous absorption in man. Curr Probl Dermatol. 1978;7:58–68.
Simon GA, Maibach HI. The pig as an experimental animal model of percutaneous permeation in man. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2000; 13(5):229–34.
Dick IP, Scott RC. Pig ear skin as an in vitro model for human skin permeability. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1992; 44(8):640–5.
United States Pharmacopeia (USP). General Chapter <621> Chromatography. In: United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP–NF). Rockville (MD): United States Pharmacopeial Convention.
Barry BW. Dermatological formulations: percutaneous absorption. New York: Marcel Dekker. 1983.
Trommer H, Neubert RHH. Overcoming the stratum corneum: the modulation of skin penetration. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006; 19(2):106–21.
Lodén M. Role of topical emollients and moisturizers in the treatment of dry skin barrier disorders. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003; 4(11):771–88.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Priyanka Sangle, Manasi Sasane, Siddhivinayak Barve, Srirupa Das, Nimitha Pinto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.