SB-NASHA: a review on scientific differentiation and skin quality enhancement

Authors

  • Chiranjiv Chhabra Skin Alive Clinics, Delhi, India, M.P, India
  • Chaithra Shenoy CUTIS Academy of Cutaneous Sciences, Bangalore, India
  • Anirban Ghosh Anirvana Clinic, Kolkata, India
  • Meghna Mour SKUCCII Supercliniq, Mumbai, India
  • Dyotona Sen Department of Medical Affairs, Galderma India
  • Sameer Jadhwar Department of Medical Affairs, Galderma India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20263752

Keywords:

Aging, ECM, Fillers, NASHA

Abstract

Skin aging is a multifactorial process driven by intrinsic biological changes and extrinsic environmental factors, leading to reduced hydration, collagen degradation, loss of elasticity, and the development of fine lines and wrinkles. Hyaluronic acid (HA), due to its superior hydrating, viscoelastic, and biocompatible properties, plays a central role in minimally invasive skin rejuvenation strategies. HA-based skin booster non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (SB-NASHA) 20 mg Skinboosters™ represent a novel therapeutic approach that improves skin quality through intradermal microinjections, restoring hydration, stimulating fibroblast activity, and promoting extracellular matrix remodelling. A structured literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify studies published between 2007 and 2025 evaluating the mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and safety of SB-NASHA 20 mg hyaluronic acid skinboosters for skin rejuvenation. Eligible studies included clinical trials and observational studies reporting outcomes related to skin hydration, elasticity, texture, or patient satisfaction. Relevant data were qualitatively synthesized. Additionally, their adjunctive use with aesthetic procedures such as botulinum toxin injections or laser resurfacing has shown synergistic effects. With a favourable safety profile and minimal downtime, SB-NASHA provides healthcare professionals with an effective, evidence-based option for managing early and advanced signs of skin aging. This review offers consolidated, practice-oriented insights and expert panel perspectives to support the optimal clinical use of SB-NASHA 20 mg in aesthetic dermatology.

References

Landau M, Fagien S. Science of hyaluronic acid beyond filling: fibroblasts and their response to the extracellular matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:188S-95S.

Kerscher M, Buntrock H, Hund M, Mokosch A, Ogilvie A, Samimi-Fard S, et al. Restylane Skinboosters for the improvement of skin quality: results of a consensus meeting. Cosm Med. 2017;2:28-34.

Williams S, Tamburic S, Stensvik H, Weber M. Changes in skin physiology and clinical appearance after microdroplet placement of hyaluronic acid in aging hands. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009;8:216-25.

Nikolis A, Enright KM. Evaluating the role of small particle hyaluronic acid fillers using micro-droplet technique in the face, neck and hands: a retrospective chart review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018;11:467-75.

Wollina U, Goldman A. Dermal fillers: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31:731.

Stabilised hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin for skin rejuvenation: face, hand, and décolletage. J Drugs Dermatol. Available from: https://jddonline.com/articles/stabilized-hyaluronic-acid-based-gel Accessed on 9 Nov 2025.

Bravo B, Correia P, Gonçalves JE, Sant’Anna B, Kerob D. Benefits of topical hyaluronic acid for skin quality and signs of skin aging: from literature review to clinical evidence. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35:e15903.

Bukhari SNA, Roswandi NL, Waqas M, Habib H, Hussain F, Khan S, et al. Hyaluronic acid, a promising skin rejuvenating biomedicine: a review of recent updates and pre-clinical and clinical investigations on cosmetic and nutricosmetic effects. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;120:1682-95.

Pawar PP, Nayan S, Venkateshwar G, Raut T, Sharma S, Seth S. Effect of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers for mid-face volume enhancement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bioinformation. 2025;21:713-20.

Vedamurthy M, Duvvuru V, Chelikani VL. Skin boosters: the upcoming boom in cosmetic dermatology for healthy skin. Cosmoderma. 2023;3:83.

A review on skin boosters: hyaluronic acid, poly-L-lactic acid and related agents. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46738/Aesthetics.2023.4.1.12. Accessed on 9 Nov 2025.

Galderma Aesthetics. Healthcare professionals Available from: https://www.galdermaaesthetics.ph/hcp.html. Accessed on 13 Nov 2025.

Belmontesi M, Romagnoli M. Injectable non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid as a skin quality booster: an expert panel consensus. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(1). [Page range or article number may be required.]

Edsman K, Nord LI, Öhrlund Å, Lärkner H, Kenne AH. Gel properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:1170-9.

Yi K, Winayanuwattikun W, Kim S, Wan J, Vachatimanont V, Putri AI, et al. Skin boosters: definitions and varied classifications. Skin Res Technol. 2024;30:e13627.

Arora G, Arora S, Sadoughifar R, Batra N. Biorevitalization of the skin with skin boosters: concepts, variables, and limitations. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:2458-62.

Rho NK, Kim HS, Kim SY, Lee W. Injectable skin boosters in aging skin rejuvenation: a current overview. Arch Plast Surg. 2024;51:528-41.

Wang F, Garza LA, Kang S, Varani J, Orringer JS, Fisher GJ, et al. In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:155-63.

Dierickx C, Larsson MK, Blomster S. Effectiveness and safety of acne scar treatment with nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid gel. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(Suppl):S10-18.

Ribé A, Ribé N. Neck skin rejuvenation: histological and clinical changes after combined therapy with fractional laser and hyaluronic acid gel. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13:154-61.

Lee BM, Han DG, Choi WS. Rejuvenating effects of facial hydrofilling using Restylane Vital. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:282-7.

2Kleine-Börger L, Kalies A, Meyer RS, Kerscher M. Physicochemical properties of injectable hyaluronic acid: skin quality boosters. Macromol Mater Eng. 2021;306:2100134.

Puljic A, Frank K, Cohen J, Otto K, Mayr J, Hugh-Bloch A, et al. A scientific framework for comparing hyaluronic acid filler crosslinking technologies. Gels. 2025;11:487.

Kerscher M, Eiben-Nielson C, Kleine-Boerger L, Haas H, Sattler S, Sattler G. Restylane Skinboosters for improved facial skin quality using two treatment sessions. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009;8(3):216-25.

Kim J. Effects of injection depth and volume of stabilized hyaluronic acid in human dermis on skin texture, hydration, and thickness. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;20:97.

Kerscher M, Bayrhammer J, Reuther T. Rejuvenating influence of a stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel on facial skin aging. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:720-6.

Reuther T, Bayrhammer J, Kerscher M. Effects of a three-session skin rejuvenation treatment using stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel on skin elasticity: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010;302:37-45.

Lim HK, Suh DH, Lee SJ, Shin MK. Rejuvenation effects of hyaluronic acid injection on nasojugal groove: prospective randomized study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014;16:32-6.

Treatment of acne scars with hyaluronic acid: an improved approach. J Drugs Dermatol. Available from: https://jddonline.com/articles/treatment-of-acne-scars. Accessed on 9 November 2025.

Man J. A double-blind comparative study of nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid versus human collagen for tissue augmentation of the dorsal hands. Dermatol Surg. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/. Accessed on 9 November 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-23

How to Cite

Chhabra, C., Shenoy, C., Ghosh, A., Mour, M., Sen, D., & Jadhwar, S. (2026). SB-NASHA: a review on scientific differentiation and skin quality enhancement. International Journal of Research in Dermatology, 12(6), 704–713. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20263752