Plantar sea urchin spine injury after travel to Thailand: clinical, dermoscopic and optical coherence tomography documentation with practical recommendations

Authors

  • Stefan Bigge Hautarztpraxis Bigge/Ungerechts, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Bianca Bigge Hautarztpraxis Bigge/Ungerechts, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20261939

Keywords:

Sea urchin injury, Plantar puncture wound, Retained foreign body, Dermoscopy, Optical coherence tomography, Travel medicine

Abstract

Sea urchin spine injuries are frequent marine related puncture injuries in tropical and subtropical travel settings. Retained fragments may cause persistent pain, foreign body granuloma, tenosynovitis, synovitis, arthritis or infection. We report a 38 year old woman who stepped on a sea urchin on the penultimate day of a vacation in Thailand. She presented after travel with multiple punctate brown black lesions on the plantar hallux and forefoot. She was afebrile, C reactive protein was below the detection limit and tetanus protection had been refreshed before travel during pre travel medical counseling. Clinical examination and dermoscopy demonstrated superficial foreign body associated puncture lesions. Visible and accessible fragments were removed, and macroscopic inspection showed dark, longitudinally ridged, tapering fragments consistent with sea urchin spine material. Dermoscopy guided optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed as adjunctive documentation and showed focal superficial architectural disruption, hyperreflective signal alteration and posterior attenuation at selected puncture sites. OCT did not determine treatment. Topical antiseptic wound care was performed and the clinical course was uncomplicated. This case highlights a structured approach to plantar sea urchin injuries: careful removal of visible accessible fragments, wound cleansing, pain control, tetanus assessment, patient education and selective conventional imaging or referral when deeper retention or critical structure involvement is suspected.

References

Schwartz Z, Cohen M, Lipner SR. Sea urchin injuries: a review and clinical approach algorithm. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32(2):150-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1638884

Gelman Y, Kong EL, Murphy-Lavoie HM. Sea Urchin Toxicity. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2026.

Dahl WJ, Jebson PJL, Louis DS. Sea urchin injuries to the hand: a case report and review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:153-6.

Skedros AJ, Skedros JG, Richards BW, Cronin JT. Sea Urchin Spine Embedded in the Sole of the Foot: Eight-Year Radiographic Follow-Up Without Removal. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e56261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56261

Atkinson PRT, Boyle A, Hartin D, McAuley D. Is hot water immersion an effective treatment for marine envenomation? Emerg Med J. 2006;23(7):503-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2005.028456

Wan B, Ganier C, Du-Harpur X, Harun N, Watt FM, Patalay R, et al. Applications and future directions for optical coherence tomography in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(6):1014-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19553

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical guidance for wound management to prevent tetanus. 2025.

Park SJ, Park JW, Choi SY, Yoo KH. Use of dermoscopy after punch removal of a veiled sea urchin spine. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(3):e14947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.14947

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Bigge, S., & Bigge, B. (2026). Plantar sea urchin spine injury after travel to Thailand: clinical, dermoscopic and optical coherence tomography documentation with practical recommendations. International Journal of Research in Dermatology, 12(4), 364–368. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20261939

Issue

Section

Case Reports