Evaluation of efficacy and in-use tolerability of a non-foaming cleanser (Venusia® cleanser) in adult men and women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20262838Keywords:
Non-foaming cleanser, Skin barrier function, Transepidermal water loss, Skin pH, In-use tolerabilityAbstract
Background: Proper cleansing is essential for maintaining skin barrier integrity, hydration, and overall skin health. Harsh cleansers can disrupt the stratum corneum, increase transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and alter skin pH, particularly in sensitive or barrier-compromised skin. This study evaluated the efficacy and in-use tolerability of Venusia® cleanser, a non-foaming formulation, in adults with different skin types.
Methods: In this single-centre, single-arm, non-randomized interventional study, participants with all skin types used Venusia® cleanser for 15 days. Efficacy was assessed using TEWL (VapoMeter), skin pH (pH meter), and pore-cleansing (3D imaging) at baseline, immediately post-application (15–20 minutes), and on day 15. In-use tolerability was evaluated using the Draize scale for erythema and oedema, along with participant self-assessment questionnaires on day 15.
Results: During the study period, 77 healthy adults with a mean age of 35.64 years were enrolled, and 76 participants completed the study. Of these, 14.5% participants had sensitive skin. TEWL decreased significantly by 9.1% at 15–20 minutes and by 17.5% at day 15 (p<0.01), indicating improved barrier function. Skin pH remained within the physiological acidic range (5.0–6.0), with a modest but significant increase of 5% at day 15 (p<0.01). Pore depth showed no significant change. Self-assessments revealed high satisfaction: 100% of participants found the cleanser gentle and easy to use, 100% reported improved skin softness and smoothness, while 98.7% experienced effective cleansing without dryness, and 98.7% observed a healthy, radiant appearance of the skin after use. No participant experienced any skin intolerance or adverse events during the study period.
Conclusions: Venusia® cleanser is a well-tolerated and effective non-foaming cleanser suitable for all adult skin types, demonstrating efficacy and high user acceptability.
References
Załęcki P, Jezusek J, Nowicka D. Topical niacinamide in daily skincare: a 3-week real-world cosmetic study. Appl Sci. 2025;15(17):9729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179729
Cui L, Jia Y, Cheng ZW, Gao Y, Zhang GL, Li JY, et al. Advancements in the maintenance of skin barrier/skin lipid composition and the involvement of metabolic enzymes. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(4):549-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12245
Baker P, Huang C, Radi R, Moll SB, Jules E, Arbiser JL. Skin barrier function: the interplay of physical, chemical, and immunologic properties. Cells. 2023;12(23):2745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12232745
Tharakan M, Lonczak L. Supporting skin structure and its barrier functions with evidence-based skin care ingredients. J Cosmet Dermatol Sci Appl. 2024;14:200-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jcdsa.2024.142013
Lee J, Sekhon N, Shen H. 32763 Cleansing efficacy of mild facial cleansers for sensitive skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(3):AB30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.153
Mijaljica D, Spada F, Harrison IP. Skin cleansing without or with compromise: soaps and syndets. Molecules. 2022;27(6):2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27062010
Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Moore DJ, Subramanyan K, Misra M, Meyer F. Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(1):16-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04S1002.x
Voegeli D. The effect of washing and drying practices on skin barrier function. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35(1):84-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000308623.68582.d7
Xia Y, Lyu Y, Yang J, He X, Yi Y, Liu J, et al. Effects of a ceramide-containing glycinate-based cleanser on the condition of oily skin and skin post-IPL treatments. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025;24(7):e70350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70350
Brooks SG, Mahmoud RH, Lin RR, Fluhr JW, Yosipovitch G. The skin acid mantle: an update on skin pH. J Invest Dermatol. 2025;145(3):509-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2024.07.009
Oliveira R, Almeida IF. Patient-centric design of topical dermatological medicines. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(4):617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040617
Draelos Z, Hornby S, Walters RM, Appa Y. Hydrophobically modified polymers can minimize skin irritation potential caused by surfactant-based cleansers. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2013;12(4):314-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12061
Kurnia F, Suyono T, Nasuyion A, Ferdinan S. Formulation and testing of the effectiveness of the ethanol extract lotion of rosella flower (Hibiscus Sabdariffa l.) as a skin moisturizer. Int J Health Pharm. 2022;2:633-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijhp.v2i4.103
Paudel D, Dhungana B, Caffe M, Krishnan P. A review of health-beneficial properties of oats. Foods. 2021;10(11):2591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112591
Diluvio L, Dattola A, Cannizzaro MV, Franceschini C, Bianchi L. Clinical and confocal evaluation of avenanthramides-based daily cleansing and emollient cream in pediatric population affected by atopic dermatitis and xerosis. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2019;154(1):32-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.18.06002-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
