Evaluation of skin irritation and skin sensitization potential of Venusia sunscreen using human repeat insult patch test
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20261933Keywords:
Human repeat insult patch test, Hypo allergenic, Skin irritation, Skin sensitization, SunscreenAbstract
Background: Sunscreens are widely used for daily photoprotection, making evaluation of their dermatological safety essential. This study aimed to assess skin irritation and sensitization (hypoallergenic) potential of venusia sun unseen (sunscreen) in healthy human participants.
Methods: This single-centre, evaluator-blinded study using human repeat insult patch test (HRIPT). It was conducted in three phases: induction (21 days), rest (14 days) and challenge phase (4 days), with skin reactions in the induction and challenge phases graded using the Draize scale and International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) scale, respectively. Test product and a negative control (0.9% isotonic saline) were applied occlusively on the back of participants using patch chambers.
Results: Out of 220 participants, 218 completed the study (mean age 38.8 years; 94.5% female). Among them, 64.2% had normal skin and 35.8% had sensitive skin. Venusia Sun Unseen was classified as non-irritant, with a mean cumulative Draize score of 0.21 (induction phase). Negative control showed a score of 0, confirming the absence of irritation. ICDRG assessments demonstrated predominantly negative responses with test product, with 176 participants exhibiting no reaction at 48 hours and any doubtful or weak reactions resolving by 96 hours (challenge phase). It showed no strong positive reactions at any time point, while negative control showed negative responses throughout the study. No adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs were reported.
Conclusions: Venusia sun unseen was found to be non-irritant and hypoallergenic, with no clinically significant irritation or sensitization observed. It was well-tolerated, supporting its routine use for photoprotection.
References
Ngoc LT, Tran VV, Moon JY, Chae M, Park D, Lee YC. Recent trends of sunscreen cosmetic: An update review. Cosmetics. 2019;6(4):64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6040064
Korrapati NH, Naz S, Swamy PK, Ranganath PA, Ankireddy K, Thomas SA. Sunscreen use among south Asian women: a survey. International J Prog Sci Technol. 2021;27(2):171-89.
Agarwal SB, Godse K, Patil S, Nadkarni N. Knowledge and attitude of general population toward effects of sun exposure and use of sunscreens. Indian J Dermatol. 2018;63(4):285-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_609_17
Naik MS, Polad RJ, Joshi MM, Ligade VS. Global trends of sunscreen research literature: a bibliometric analysis over the period of 2010–2020. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2022;15:161–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_110_21
Passeron T, Lim HW, Goh CL, Kang HY, Ly F, Morita A, et al. Sun exposure behaviours as a compromise to paradoxical injunctions: Insight from a worldwide survey. J European Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37:2481–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.19421
Lim HW, Saint Aroman M, Skayem C, Halioua B, Perez Cullell N, Ben Hayoun Y, et al. Sun exposure and protection habits: Self‐reported attitudes, knowledge and behaviours. J European Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38(10):2024-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20080
Lodén M, Beitner H, Gonzalez H, Edström DW, Åkerström U, Austad J, et al. Sunscreen use: controversies, challenges and regulatory aspects. British J Dermatol. 2011;165:255–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10298.x
FDA. FDA Proposes Expanding Sunscreen Active Ingredient List. 2025. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-proposes-expanding-sunscreen-active-ingredient-list. Accessed on 9th December 2025.
Sander M, Sander M, Burbidge T, Beecker J. The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for the prevention of skin cancer. CMAJ. 2020;192:1802–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.201085
Mahajan VK, Sharma N, Sharma V, Verma R, Chandel M, Singh R. Topical sunscreens: a narrative review for contact sensitivity, potential allergens, clinical evaluation and management for their optimal use in clinical practice. Indian Dermatol J. 2024;15:920–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_111_24
Pan Y, Ma X, Song Y, Zhao J, Yan S. Questionnaire and lactic acid sting test play different role on the assessment of sensitive skin: a cross-sectional study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;2:1215–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S325166
Sheshadri A, Marathe S, Rodrigues AP, Fernandes R, Sadowski Ł. Synergy of industrial wastes in eco-friendly, air-cured alkali activated pavement concrete composites: properties, embodied carbon and energy assessment and modelling. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 2026;27(2):431-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2025.2495705
Romanhole RC, Fava ALM, Tundisi LL, de Macedo LM, Dos Santos ÉM, Ataide JA, et al. Unplanned absorption of sunscreen ingredients: Impact of formulation and evaluation methods. Int J Pharm. 2020;591:120013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120013
Huang W, Zhang W, Tomihisa S, Kuang H, Li R, Chen X. Innovative safe sunscreens technology: evaluation of skin penetration through in vitro/in vivo assays and environmental friendliness. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;24:70538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70538
Nisbet SJ. Absence of human skin irritation and allergenic potential after repeated patch applications of a lamellar moisturizer. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18:377–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12535
McNamee PM, Api AM, Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Gilpin DA, Hall BM, et al. A review of critical factors in the conduct and interpretation of the human repeat insult patch test. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;52:24–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.019
Mishra M, Patel N, Pandya I. Evaluating the dermal safety and skin compatibility of personal care cosmetic products formulated with natural ingredients: An in-vivo primary irritation patch test study. Dermatol Res Skin Care. 2023;7(6):176.
Randhawa M, Wang S, Leyden JJ, Cula GO, Pagnoni A, Southall MD. Daily use of a facial broad spectrums sunscreen over one-year significantly improves clinical evaluation of photoaging. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:1354–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000879
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
