Laser-based interventions for scarring alopecia: a meta-analytic review of clinical outcomes

Authors

  • Aishwarya Lakshmi Sekar Department of Dermatology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India
  • Sneha Thamilselvam Department of Dermatology, Sri Satya Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chennai, India
  • Aishwarya Devaraj Department of Dermatology, Manipal Hospitals, Gurgaon, India
  • Nitin Katakam School of Medicine, St Louis University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20261100

Keywords:

Scarring alopecia, Laser therapy, Low-level laser therapy, Cicatricial alopecia, Meta-analysis

Abstract

Scarring alopecias are a group of inflammatory disorders resulting in irreversible hair loss and significant psychosocial burden. Standard therapies often yield incomplete responses, prompting exploration of alternative treatments. Laser-based therapies, including low-level laser therapy (LLLT), superluminescent diode (sLED) therapy, long-pulsed Nd:YAG, and excimer lasers, have emerged as potential options. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of laser-based interventions in treating scarring alopecias. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies included were non-randomized clinical studies reporting outcomes after laser-based interventions for scarring alopecias. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment (ROBINS-I) were performed independently by two reviewers. Due to heterogeneity, descriptive synthesis and qualitative forest plots were generated. Seven studies involving 51 patients were included. Conditions studied included lichen planopilaris (LPP), frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), dissecting cellulitis (DCS), folliculitis decalvans (FD), and acne keloidalis nuchae (AKN). Laser interventions were associated with clinical or trichoscopic improvement in all studies. Two studies reported complete or near-complete disease remission. No significant adverse events were reported. Risk of bias was serious or critical in all studies, primarily due to small sample sizes and lack of controls. Laser-based therapies demonstrate promising clinical benefits in scarring alopecias, particularly in disease stabilization and symptom improvement. However, due to the high risk of bias and methodological limitations, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

References

Avci P, Gupta GK, Clark J, Wikonkal N, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(2):144-64.

Darwin E, Hirt PA, Fertig RM, Doliner B, Delcanto GM, Jimenez JJ. Gender differences in self-perception and psychosocial impact of hair loss: a population-based study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(1):61-7.

Mirmirani P. Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: what has been achieved, what is yet to be learned. Dermatol Clin. 2013;31(1):153-61.

Dlova NC. Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and histopathology. Dermatol Clin. 2021;39(2):183-9.

Zarei M, Wikramanayake TC, Falto-Aizpurua L, Schachner LA, Jimenez JJ. Low level laser therapy and hair regrowth: an evidence-based review. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(2):363-71.

Zhang Y, Su J, Ma K, Fu X, Zhang C. Photobiomodulation therapy with different wavebands for hair loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2022;48(6):e151-8.

Gupta AK, Carviel JL. Meta-analysis of photobiomodulation for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. J Dermatol Treat. 2021;32(5):526-9.

Liu KH, Liu D, Chen YT, Chin SY. Comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for adult androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(4):725-33.

Randolph M, Shafran R, Dovigi E, Tosti A. Use of low-level laser therapy in lichen planopilaris: a case series. Skin Appendage Disord. 2020;6(3):146-9.

Meesters AA, Alkemade HA, van der Veen JPW. Laser hair removal as a treatment for folliculitis decalvans: a case report and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(2):208-11.

Madura C, Shah P, Shah R, Shah V. Evaluation of long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal as adjuvant to surgery for acne keloidalis nuchae: a case series. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021;14(2):195-8.

Gerkowicz A, Bartosińska J, Koper K, Krasowska D. Superluminescent diodes as an adjunctive therapy in frontal fibrosing alopecia and lichen planopilaris: A pilot study. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(5):e13006.

Parlette EC, Kroeger N, Price VH. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for dissecting cellulitis of the scalp. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(8):1152-4.

Navarini AA, Kolios AG, Prinz Vavricka BM, Haug S, Trüeb RM. Low-dose excimer 308-nm laser for treatment of lichen planopilaris: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(11):1321-3.

Navarini AA, Trüeb RM. Excimer laser for early frontal fibrosing alopecia: case observations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(9):1214-6.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

How to Cite

Sekar, A. L., Thamilselvam, S., Devaraj, A., & Katakam, N. (2026). Laser-based interventions for scarring alopecia: a meta-analytic review of clinical outcomes. International Journal of Research in Dermatology, 12(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20261100

Issue

Section

Meta-Analysis