Evaluation of the effectiveness of intense pulse light vs topical benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in patients of inflammatory acne receiving oral azithromycin pulse therapy: a randomized control trial

Sandeep B. Hade; Sumedh R. Khandare; Ganesh S. Narwane

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20252066

Authors

Sandeep B. Hade Department of Dermatology, MIMER Medical College, Talegaon-Dabhade, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Sumedh R. Khandare Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra, India
Ganesh S. Narwane Department of Radio-Diagnosis, MIMER Medical College, Talegaon-Dabhade, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20252066

Keywords:

Intense pulse light, Inflammatory acne, Oral azithromycin pulse therapy, Topical benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory condition of the pilosebaceous unit, primarily affecting adolescents and young adults. Conventional treatments, including topical and systemic therapies, often lead to inconsistent outcomes, resistance, and poor compliance, contributing to psychological distress and scarring. Light-based therapies, particularly Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), have emerged as effective non-invasive alternatives, improving patient adherence and delivering faster results. Given the limited comparative studies between IPL and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, this study aims to evaluate their efficacy in treating inflammatory acne.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care dermatology center, enrolling 60 patients who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to IPL therapy or topical benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, with both groups receiving oral azithromycin 250 mg thrice weekly for two months. Lesion assessment was performed using the Michaelson Severity Index (MSI), along with erythema grading and photographic analysis.

Results: The results showed greater improvement in lesion severity with IPL, with higher moderate and good resolution at the 4th sitting compared to benzoyl peroxide. Although IPL patients experienced more transient erythema (32%), they had fewer overall adverse effects. Statistical analysis confirmed significant improvements in acne severity with IPL, indicating superior effectiveness in reducing inflammatory acne lesions.

Conclusions: IPL showed superior efficacy in reducing inflammatory acne with fewer adverse effects.

Keywords: Intense Pulse Light, Topical Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel, Inflammatory Acne, Oral Azithromycin Pulse Therapy

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Lever L, MR. Current views on the etiology, pathogenesis and treatment of acne vulgaris. Drugs. 1990;39:681-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199039050-00005

Chan JJ, Rohr JB. Acne vulgaris: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Australasian J Dermatol. 2000;41:69-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-0960.2000.00462.x

Yeung CK, Teo LH, Xiang LH, Chan HH. A community-based epidemiological study of acne vulgaris in Hong Kong adolescents. Acta dermato-Venereologica. 2002;82(2):875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015550252948121

Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Depression and suicidal ideation in dermatology patients with acne, alopecia areata, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. The British J Dermatol. 1998;139(5):846-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02511.x

Cotterill JA, Cunliffe WJ. Suicide in dermatological patients. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:246-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.18131897.x

Ross EV. Optical treatments for acne. Dermatol Ther. 2005;18:253-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2005.05024.x

Ciocon DH, Boker A, Goldberg DJ. Intense pulsed light: what works, what's new, what's next. Facial Plastic Surg. 2009;25(05):290-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1243077

Patidar MV, Deshmukh AR, Khedkar MY. Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: Comparison of two different fluences. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61(5):545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.190115

Kjeldstad B. Different photoinactivation mechanisms in Propionibacterium acnes for near‐ultraviolet and visible light. Photochem Photobiol. 1987;46(3):363-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1987.tb04782.x

Monroe H. Acne cures from the past. Available at http://www.ehow.com/way. Accessed on 2013 January 2025.

Poli F, DrenoB, Verschoore M. An epidemiological study of acne in female adults: Results of a survey conducted in France. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001;15:541-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2001.00357.x

Goodman GJ. Management of post-acne scarring: What are the options for treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2000;1:3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200001010-00001

Chalker DK, Shalita A, Smith JG, Swann RW. A double – bling Study of the effectiveness of a 3% erythromycin and 5% benzoyl peroxide combination in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;9:933-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(83)70211-2

Lyons RE, Comparative effectiveness of benzoyl peroxide andtretinoin in acne vulgaris. Int J Dermatol. 1978;17:246–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1978.tb06072.x