Occupational skin dermatosis among dental lab technicians in Khartoum state, 2023-2024

Razan Mohamed Alamin Abbas; Abdelrahman Magzoub; Bakri Al Alagraa; Nawaf Almuutairi

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20250427

Authors

Razan Mohamed Alamin Abbas Dermatology Sudan Medical Specialization Board, Khartoum, Sudan
Abdelrahman Magzoub Dermatology Sudan Medical Specialization Board, Khartoum, Sudan
Bakri Al Alagraa Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Khartoum Dermatology and Venereology Teaching Hospital, Khartuam, Sudan
Nawaf Almuutairi Department of Dermatology & Venereology University of Kuwait, Kuwait

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20250427

Keywords:

Occupational skin dermatosis, Denture material, Methyl methacrylate

Abstract

Background: Occupational skin dermatosis is of a significant concern among dental lab technicians due to their exposure to chemicals and materials used in dental prosthetics. These exposures can lead to various skin conditions, impacting the health and productivity of the workforce. To determine the prevalence, clinical features and associated factors of occupational skin dermatosis among dental lab technicians in Khartoum State from 2023 to 2024.

Methods: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted among 171 dental lab technicians in Khartoum State. Data collection involved a structured questionnaire, including demographic information, clinical features of skin conditions and use of protective equipment. Analysis was performed using SPSS Version 26, with descriptive and inferential statistics applied to identify significant associations.

Results: Of the 171 participants, 85.4% reported work-related skin symptoms, with dry skin being the most prevalent symptom (100%). Contact with denture material, particularly methyl methacrylate (MMA), was implicated in all reported cases. The use of protective equipment was low, with only 34.2% of participants using gloves or masks regularly. The prevalence of symptoms was significantly associated with the use of MMA and inadequate protective measures.

Conclusions: The study underscores a high prevalence of occupational skin dermatosis among dental lab technicians in Khartoum State, highlighting the need for improved occupational health practices. Implementing training programs on the proper use of protective equipment and regular monitoring of skin health are recommended to mitigate these risks.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from acrylics. Br J Dermatol. 1994;131(5):752-8.

Rustemeyer T, Frosch PJ. Occupational contact dermatitis in dental professionals. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34(4): 221-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02182.x

Wrangsjö K, Örtengren U, Löwhagen GB. Prevalence of allergy in dental personnel: a follow-up study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27(3):227-32.

Hamann CP, Rogers K, Sullivan K, Lallande J, Sullivan T. Occupational-related allergies in dental professionals: reactions to latex, acrylates and glutaraldehyde. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(4):500-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0207

Geukens S, Goossens A. Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44(3):153-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044003153.x

Alanko K, Susitaival P, Jolanki R, Kanerva L. Occupational skin diseases among dental nurses. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50(2):77-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00304.x

Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Swierczynska-Machura D, Chomiczewska D. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to metals in dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(3):161-6.

Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Occupational skin diseases in dental nurses. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40(5):310-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06000.x

Hadi SM, Awad SM, Farghaly MM. Occupational contact dermatitis among dental professionals: prevalence and risk factors. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2019;94(1):8.

Warshaw EM, Zug KA, Belsito DV, Contact dermatitis of the hands: cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 1994-2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(5):782-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2008.08012

Rost M, Kappes UP, Wiedow O, Elsner P. Contact allergy to acrylates in dental technicians–influence of preventive measures. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(3):136-40.

Garcia-Gavin J, Timmermans A, Amaro C, Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Goossens A. Acrylates from nail cosmetics: can sensitization be prevented. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(4):239-46.

Lee SY, Lee KT, Kweon HY, Prevention of occupational skin diseases in dental laboratories: effectiveness of PPE and educational interventions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020;93(4):473-81.

Al-Ali K, Hashim R, Al-Sohaimi T. Occupational hazards in dental laboratories: a review. J Int Dent Med Res. 2018;11(2):653-60.

Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ. Contact dermatitis due to methacrylates in dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(5):257-9.

Abdulwahab M, Al-Wazzan K, Al-Harbi F, Al-Shammari A, Al-Khodhairi A. Occupational health hazards in dental technology. Saudi Med J. 2010;31(6):633-7.

Kanerva L, Lauerma AI, Susitaival P, Estlander T. Patch testing with dental screening series in dental patients, nurses and office employees. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34(4):263-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02197.x

Rustemeyer T, Van Hoogstraten IMW, Von Blomberg BME, Bruynzeel DP. Mechanisms of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis in dental professionals. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43(4):213-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03827-3_3

Katelaris CH, Smith WJ, Webb C. Latex allergy: a problem in dental surgery. Australian Dental J. 1996;41(3):234-8.