Method development and process validation in dermatology: assessing methods of UV exposure for inducing skin tanning and efficacy evaluation of anti-tanning agents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20242649Keywords:
Melanin index, Erythema index, Anti-tanning, Sunlight exposure, UV radiation, Dermatological assessmentAbstract
Background: Understanding the differential impacts of natural versus artificial UV exposure and validating a method to evaluate tanning prevention products are crucial for advancements in dermatological research and skincare. This study aimed to develop and validate a process for inducing skin tanning using natural sunlight and artificial UV-lamps, determining the optimal UV dosages to induce controlled tanning and erythema.
Methods: Six adults aged 18 to 55 were exposed to natural sunlight and a 365nm UV-lamp, with incremental exposure times and doses. Sunlight exposure was at 7600 μW/cm2 for 20, 35, and 50 minutes, while the UV-lamp provided 78, 97.5, and 117 mJ/cm² doses. Skin tan and erythema were measured using Mexameter® MX-18-probe on days 1, 3, and 7. Test products A and B were applied to evaluate their protective efficacy, with untreated sites as controls. Safety assessments included dermatological evaluations for adverse effects.
Results: Sunlight exposure led to a mean erythema index (EI) increase of 40.22, 42.55-, and 47.12-units post-exposure, and mean melanin index (MI) increase of 37.78, 46.22, and 59.20 units by day 3. UV-lamp exposure resulted in less consistent increases, with maximum EI rise of 12.09 units and MI rise of 7.79 units. Test products significantly prevented tanning and erythema compared to untreated sites, with no adverse effects observed.
Conclusions: Direct sunlight exposure was more effective than artificial UV-light in reliably inducing tanning and erythema, establishing it as a method for such studies. The UV-lamp doses were insufficient for consistent results. The study validated a method for evaluating anti-tanning products, confirming their efficacy and safety. These findings support further research and optimization in UV exposure techniques, standardizing a method to induce tanning using direct sunlight exposure.
References
Nayak C, Nouveau S, Agrawal D, Kohli M, Bernerd F, Misra N. Skin hyperpigmentation in Indian population: Insights and best practice. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61(5):487.
Thawabteh AM, Jibreen A, Karaman D, Thawabteh A, Karaman R. Skin Pigmentation Types, Causes and Treatment-A Review. Molecules. 2023;28(12):4839.
Oakley A. DermNet. Dermatology Resource. Pigmentation disorders. Available at: https://dermnetnz.org/topics/pigmentation-disorders. Accessed on 20 June 2024.
PLENSDORF S, MARTINEZ J. AAFP. Common Pigmentation Disorders; 2009. Available at: https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2009/0115/p109.html. Accessed on 20 June 2024.
Saraf S, Kaur C. In vitro sun protection factor determination of herbal oils used in cosmetics. Pharmacogn Res. 2010;2(1):22.
Hughes SN, Lowe NJ, Gross K, Mark L, Goffe B, Hughes H, Cole C. Assessment of Natural Sunlight Protection Provided by 10 High-SPF Broad-Spectrum Sunscreens and Sun-Protective Fabrics. CrossRef Listing Deleted. 2021;55:157-69.
González S, Aguilera J, Berman B, Calzavara-Pinton P, Gilaberte Y, Goh CL, et al. Expert Recommendations on the Evaluation of Sunscreen Efficacy and the Beneficial Role of Non-filtering Ingredients. Front Med. 2022;9:790207.
Ma Y, Tan Y, Hu Y, Pu W, Xu J, Jin L, Wang J. Quantitative Assessment of Ultraviolet-Induced Erythema and Tanning Responses in the Han Chinese Population. Phenomics. 2023;4(2):138-45.
U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry Labeling and Effectiveness Testing: Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-The-Counter Human Use-Small Entity Compliance Guide. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/ labeling-and-effectiveness-testing-sunscreen-drug-products-over-counter-human-use-small-entity. Accessed on 15 June 2024.
Bureau of Indian Standards. Cosmetics - Sun Protecion Test Methods - In vivo Determination of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) (ICS 71.100.70). Department of Consumer affairs. 2021. Available at: https://www.services.bis.gov.in/tmp/WCPCD5520109_22072022_2.pdf. Accessed on 15 June 2024.
Benedetti J. MSD Manual Consumer Version. Overview of Sunlight and Skin Damage - Skin Disorders. Available at: https://www.msdmanuals. com/en-in/home/skin-disorders/sunlight-and-skin-damage/overview-of-sunlight-and-skin-damage. Accessed on 15 June 2024.
Mead MN. Benefits of Sunlight: A Bright Spot for Human Health. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(4):A160-7.
Heinrich U, Moore CE, De Spirt S, Tronnier H, Stahl W. Green Tea Polyphenols Provide Photoprotection, Increase Microcirculation, and Modulate Skin Properties of Women. J Nutrit. 2011;141(6):1202-8.
Li N, Deng L, Xiang L, Liang Y. Photoprotective Effect of Tea and its Extracts against Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced Skin Disorders. Trop J Pharmaceut Res. 2014;13(3):475.
OyetakinWhite P, Tribout H, Baron E. Protective Mechanisms of Green Tea Polyphenols in Skin. Oxidative Med Cellular Longevity. 2012;2012;560682.
Ramble T. The Best Sunscreen Ingredients: Where They’re Approved-And Banned. 2019. Healthline. Available at: https://www.healthline.com/health/ beauty-skin-care/best-sunscreen-ingredients. Accessed on 15 June 2024.
Singha LR, Das MK. Nanocosmeceuticals Innovation, Application, and Safety, 1st ed, Elsevier. 2022.
