Efficacy of long pulse neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet 1064 laser permanent hair reduction treatment in skin types V and VI Nigerian patients

Ehiaghe L. Anaba; Babawale Arabambi

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20231159

Authors

Ehiaghe L. Anaba Department of Medicine, Lagos State University College of Medicine/Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
Babawale Arabambi Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20231159

Keywords:

Laser, Hair removal, Safety, Fitzpatrick, Skin type

Abstract

Background: There are no studies examining the use, safety, efficacy, effective fluence and pulse duration of Laser hair reduction in Nigerians. This study aimed to document the safety, efficacy, effective fluence and pulse duration, and the number of Laser sessions to achieve permanent hair reduction.

Methods: A retrospective review of Laser hair removal in 87 FitzPatrick skin type V and VI patients from January 2017 to August 2021 using the neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:Yag). The fluence (Joules/cm³), pulse duration (msecs), Laser site and interval between Laser sessions were documented. Data was summarized using frequencies and percentage proportion. Comparison of pulse duration, fluence, and the number of sessions between different body sites was tested using analysis of variance.

Results: A total of 354 laser sessions were performed in 87 patients made up of 80 females and 7 males; mean age of 35.8±9.24 years. The face was the most frequently treated site (67.5% of the sessions). The mean number of laser sessions, pulse duration and fluence were 4.07±4.22, 19.38±1.48 (msec) and 18.22±1.29 (J/cm³) respectively. An average of 6 sessions was required to achieve permanent hair reduction: the face required a significantly lower number of sessions, p=0.043.

Conclusions: The long pulse Nd:Yag 1064 laser is an effective and safe Laser for hair removal in skin types V and VI. The effective, safe pulse duration and fluence are 16 to 22 msec and 15 to 20 J/cm² respectively. The face requires fewer number of Laser sessions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alizadeh N, Ayyoubi S, Naghipour M, Hassanzadeh R, Mohtasham-Amiri Z, Zaresharifi S et al. Can Laser Treatment Improve Quality of life of Hirsute Women? Int J Women’s Health. 2017;9:777-80.

Shapiro J, Lui H. Treatments for unwanted facial hair. Skin Ther Lett. 2005;10:1-4.

Gan SD, Graber EM. Laser hair removal: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:823-38.

Rogachefsky AS, Becker K, Weiss G, Goldberg DJ. Evaluation of a long-pulsed laser at different parameters: an analysis of both fluence and pulse duration. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:932-5;

Nabi N, Bhat YJ, Dar UK, Hakeem A, Mir SA, Shah IH, et al. Comparative study of the clinico-trichoscopic response to treatment of hirsutism with long pulsed (1064 nm) laser in idiopathic hirsutism and polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. Lasers Med Sci. 2021.

Fayne RA, Perper M, Eber AE, Aldahan AS, Nouri K. Laser and Light Treatments for Hair Reduction in Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV-VI: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018; 19:237-52.

Bencini PL, Luci A, Galimberti M, Ferranti G. Long-term epilation with long-pulsed neodimium. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:175-8.

Ibrahimi OA, Avram MM, Hanke CW, Kilmer SL, Anderson RR. Laser Hair Removal. Dermatol Ther. 2011;24:94-107.

Arsiwala SZ, Majid IM. Methods to overcome poor responses and challenges of laser hair removal in dark skin. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2019; 85:3-9.

Galadari I. Comparative evaluation of different hair removal lasers in skin types IV, V and VI. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:68-70.

Alster TS, Bryan H, Williams CM. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in pigmented skin: a clinical and histological evaluation. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:885-9

Shrimal A, Sardar S, Roychoudhury S, Sarkar S. Long-pulsed Nd: YAG Laser and Intense Pulse Light-755 nm for Idiopathic Facial Hirsutism: A Comparative Study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2017;10: 40-4.

Jansy R, Manickam N, Kandasamy M, Gopalan K, Revathi D. Efficacy of long pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of hirsutism. Indian J Clin Exp Dermatol. 2018;4:85-9.

Haedersdal M, Wulf HC. Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:9-20.

Battle EF, Hobbs LM. Laser-assisted hair removal for darker skin types. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:177-83.

Puri N. Comparative study of diode laser versus neodymium-yttrium aluminum: garnet laser versus intense pulsed light for the treatment of hirsutism. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015;8:97-101.

Mohamed EE, Ahmed AM, Tawfik KM, Ibrahim SM. Trichoscopic changes in hair during treatment of hirsutism with 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15: 31-5.

Mittal R, Sriram S, Sandhu K. Evaluation of Long-pulsed 1064 nm Laser-assisted Hair Removal vs Multiple Treatment Sessions and Different Hair Types in Indian Patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2008; 1:75-9.

Rao K, Sankar TK. Long-pulsed laser-assisted hair removal in Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:623-6.

Bhat YJ, Bashir S, Nabi N, Hassan I. Laser treatment in hirsutism: an update. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020;10:e2020048.