DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20214915
Published: 2021-12-24

Clinicopathological, trichoscopic and biochemical parameters in females with patterned hair loss

Krishnendra Varma, Aishwarya Mahadik, Ujjwal Kumar, Somya Agrawal

Abstract


Background: Hair has no vital functions in humans but its loss from the scalp can create a sense of negative body image and anxiety. The term ‘female pattern hair loss’ is explained by decrease in hair fiber production and their eventual miniaturization. To evaluate the clinicopathological, trichoscopic and biochemical parameters in females with patterned hair loss.

Methods: 37 females in age group of 18-45 years complaining of reduction in hair volume with diffuse thinning over the crown were included in our study after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Detailed history was taken and clinical examination was done. Written consent and ethical clearance from Institutional Ethical Committee was taken. Ludwig grading, evaluation of other clinical signs of hyperandrogenism and trichoscopy was done. These females then underwent histopathological examination. 10 ml blood was withdrawn to assess anemic, thyroid and hormonal profile in these females.

Results: Out of 37 females examined majority of the females had Ludwig grade 1 hair loss. Serum levels of testosterone were found significantly related to clinical signs of hyperandrogenism. Hair diameter variability and peri pilar sign formed the majority in trichoscopy (62.2% each). The most common histopathological finding was perifollicular infiltrate (70.3%).

Conclusions: FPHL can contribute to severe psychological distress. Despite its high prevalence, its diagnosis and treatment still impose several difficulties in clinical practice. Although hormonal factors are believed to contribute, its pathogenesis still remains elusive.


Keywords


Female pattern hair loss, Histopathology, Trichoscopy, Hormonal profile

Full Text:

PDF

References


Olsen EA. Female pattern hair loss. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;45:70-80.

Sinclair R. Winding the clock back on female androgenetic alopecia. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:1157-8.

Gan DCC, Sinclair RD. Prevalence of male and female pattern hair loss in Maryborough. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2005;10:184-9.

Zhang X, Caulloo S, Zhao Y, Zhang B, Cai Z, Yang J. Female pattern hair loss: Clinico-laboratory findings and trichoscopy depending on disease severity. Int J Trichology. 2012;4:23-8.

Tandon S, Arora P, Gautam RK, Bhardwaj M, Garga U, Sharma Correlation between clinical features, biochemical parameters, and histopathological findings in women with patterned baldness: Study from North India. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2019;12:42-8.

Paik JH, Yoon JB, Sim WY, Kim BS KN. The prevalence and types of androgenetic alopecia in Korean men and women. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145:95-9.

Cela E, Robertson C, Rush K, Kousta E, White DM, Wilson H, et al. Prevalence of polycystic ovaries in women with androgenic alopecia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;149:439-42.

Moltz L. Hormonal diagnosis in so-called androgenetic alopecia in the female. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1988;48:203-14.

Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Sisti A D-EB. Hair loss in women. Minerva Ginecol. 2009;61:445-52.

Whiting DA. Diagnostic and predictive value of horizontal sections of scalp biopsy specimens in male pattern androgenetic alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28:755-63.

Lattanand A JW. Male pattern alopecia: A histological and histochemical study. J Cutan Pathol. 1975;2:58-70.