Slit skin smear or Fite-Faraco staining of tissue sample, which is a better indicator of bacillary load?

Authors

  • Shruti Appannavar Department of Dermatology, Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-8747
  • Kiran . Department of Dermatology, Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Amit Ashok Ingalagi Department of Anatomy, Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Rohith . Department of Dermatology, Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20213344

Keywords:

Slit skin smear, Fite-Faraco, Bacillary load

Abstract

Background: Leprosy is clinically diagnosed on the basis of presence of following cardinal signs: 1. Hypopigmented or erythematous anesthetic patch on skin, 2. Thickened and/or tender peripheral/cutaneous nerve, 3. Acid fast bacilli in slit skin smear. This study aims at comparing bacillary indices in slit skin smears with that from biopsy samples.

Methods: After obtaining informed written consent, slit skin smears were performed and observed for acid fast bacilli. Punch biopsies of lesions were taken and processed and stained with Fite-Faraco technique. The presence or absence of acid-fast bacilli in both modalities was noted.

Results: Slit skin smears were positive in 24 patients and negative in the rest. And 26 patient’s biopsy reports had Fite-Faraco positivity, out of the total 46 patients. The p=0.67 which was not significant at significance value 0.05.

Conclusions: Skin smear is an equally reliable indicator of bacillary load as Fite-Faraco bacillary index in tissue.

 

Author Biographies

Shruti Appannavar, Department of Dermatology, Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India

Dermatology, Junior Resident

Kiran ., Department of Dermatology, Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India

Dermatology- Junior resident

References

Global Health Observatory report 2018-19-WHO. World Health Organization. Available at: https:// www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leprosy. Accessed on 2 March 2021.

Ridley DS, Jopling WH. A classification of leprosy for research purposes. Lepr Rev. 1962;33:119-28.

Groenen G, Saunderson P, Ji B, ILEP Medico Social Commission. ILEP Learning Guide Three: How to do a Skin Smear Examination for Leprosy. London Int Federation Anti-Leprosy Asso. 2003.

Job CK, Chacko CJG. A simplified 6 group classification of leprosy. Lepr India. 1982;54:26-32.

Mahajan VK. Slit-skin smear in leprosy: lest we forget it! Indian J Lepr. 2013;85:177-83.

Kumaran SM, Bhat IP, Madhukara J. Comparison of Bacillary Index on Slit Skin Smear with Bacillary Index of Granuloma in Leprosy and its Relevance to Present Therapeutic. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(1):51-4.

Adiga DS, Hippargi SB, Rao G, Saha D, Yelikar BR, Karigoudar M. Evaluation of Fluorescent Staining for Diagnosis of Leprosy and its Impact on Grading of the Disease: Comparison with Conventional Staining. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(10):EC23-6.

Reja AHH, Biswas N, Biswas S, Dasgupta S, Chowdhury IH, Banerjee S et al. Fite-Faraco staining in combination with multiplex polymerase chain reaction: A new approach to leprosy diagnosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;79(5):693-700.

Aishwarya P, Bhushan M, Anugandha G, Sugat J, Sudhir S. Comparison of Efficacy of Slit Skin Smear and Fite Faraco Stain on Histopathology Specimens in Cases of Leprosy. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2020;14.

Lyon S, Lyon AC, Da Silva RC, Grossi MA, Lyon SH, Bührer-Sékula S et al. A comparison of ML Flow serology and slit skin smears to assess the bacterial load in newly diagnosed leprosy patients in Brazil. Lepr Rev. 2008;79(2):162-70.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles