A study on correlation between allergen and allergic contact dermatitis

Authors

  • Ashok Kumar B. Nagure Department of Dermatology, KBNIMS, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
  • Guruprasad Kalyanrao Y. Department of Dermatology, Bidar Institute of Medical sciences, Bidar, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20175125

Keywords:

Allergen, Allergic contact dermatitis, PPD

Abstract

Background: Agents which cause contact dermatitis are simple chemical compounds and by themselves these agents will not cause sensitization and are called haptens. These require another molecule usually a protein called the carrier molecule derived from the epidermis to cause allergic sensitization. The confirmation of contact dermatitis is done by the patch testing. There is no substitute for the patch test in the management of allergic contact dermatitis.

Methods: After selecting the patient suspected to have allergic contact dermatitis the findings were recorded in the proforma which also includes the systemic examination of CVS, CNS, GIT and respiratory system to study systemic correlation if any. Investigation were done which included Hb%, TLC, DLC, urine routine and microscopic examination, patch testing and other special investigations if required. The patient was subjected to patch testing after the acute stage has subsided and the patient was on no therapy with topical or systemic steroids prior to patch testing.

Results: The incidence of allergic contact dermatitis due to cosmetics was found in 7 (5.6%) cases. In that hair dye (PPD) inducing dermatitis was found in 4 (57.4%) and due to hair oil 1 (14.2%), kumkum 1 (14.2%) and Sunsilk shampoo 1 (14.2%). The incidence of PPD sensitivity in this series of 125 cases was 4 (3.2%).

Conclusions: PPD is a well-known potent sensitizer, it is a chief constituent of the commonly used hair dyes and also some other cosmetics like nail polish.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Fisher AA. The role of patch testing in Allergic contact dermatitis In: Fisher AA, editors. Contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. London: Henry Kimpton publishers; 1973: 25-28.

Pasricha JS. General features in: JS Pasricha editors. Contact dermatitis in India, 2nd ed. New Delhi: The off setters; 1988: 8-12.

Fisher AA. The use of patch test series. In: Fisher AA, editors. Contact dermatitis, 2nd ed. London; Henry Kimpton Publishers; 1972: 66.

Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. The Duhring chamber. An improved technique for the epicutaneous testing of irritant and allergic reactions. Contact Dermatitis. 1973;5:73.

Kar S, Srinivas CR, Balachandran C, Shenoi SD. Patch test with preservatives. Indian J dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1992;58:25-6.

Hjorth N, Roed- Peterson J. Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis. 1976;2:28-42.

Bruze M, Fregert S, Gruvberger B. Patch testing with cement containing iron sulphate. Contact Dermatitis Dermatologic Clin. 1990;8:173-6.

Christensen OB. Nickel dermatitis an update. Dermatologic Clin. 1990;8(1):37-40.

Angelini G. Veena GA. Meneghini CL. Shoe contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1980;6:279-83.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-23

How to Cite

Nagure, A. K. B., & Kalyanrao Y., G. (2017). A study on correlation between allergen and allergic contact dermatitis. International Journal of Research in Dermatology, 3(4), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20175125

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles